HRzone blogs

How would double-dip affect L&D spend?

Back to blog homepage for: HR means business: by Samantha Arnold of ETS

The economic picture again seems to be dominated by doom and gloom.  Let’s leave talk of the Euro zone debt crisis and possible double-dip recession to one side though.  I am interested in what effect another round of economic belt-tightening may have on HR practitioners?  Will companies, for example, stop investing employees if the economic situation worsens?

A recent CIPD study suggests this may not be the case.  Seven in 10 employers report that spending on coaching has either increased or stayed the same since the last recession.  And this comes during a period where budgets for HR have remained very tight.  So what conclusions can we draw? 

It is encouraging that learning and development is being prioritised by business leaders.  Nobody can be sure what the immediate future holds for the economy.  But what is sure is that companies, by investing in employees, can help better prepare themselves. 

Of course this doesn’t mean blindly spending on endless learning and development initiatives.  Companies should identify their talent and prioritise developing top performers.  Set in place plans to nuture, develop, engage and retain them.  By doing so, they can build from within. 

Create your free account

  • Access all articles in full
  • View multimedia
  • Receive email bulletins
  • Private messaging
Register now

Login

Forgotten your password?

Editor's Note - May 10

Had a busy week with two days at the Responsible Business Summit in London. What struck me was the appetite for sustainability in the corporate world. I spoke to senior figures from multinationals who knew wholeheartedly that businesses in the future would not succeed if the society around them failed.

Much of this appetite was understandably focused on collaboration - the future of sustainability. Words that were previously indicative of success - power, might, scale, size - are no longer enough in the open source, peer-reviewed future where opponents will not simply grumble and moan and then leave you in peace. Companies must work with governments, NGOs, charities and social enterprises as a matter of course. And even competitors, where necessary.

Facilitating this collaboration is the big challenge of the next five years. Highly-strung and ego-centric companies, feverish with the need to protect their brand, will struggle the most, but it's either adapt or die.

The business/charity relationship is one of the most interesting focal points. Business power can drive positive social change in so many ways but charities are the key holders to communities. As businesses are expected more and more to play a stake in the future, charity partnerships should be top of the corporate priority list. Businesses that don't work closely with a charity will find themselves with reputational problems.

There's a lot more to CSR, of course, but collaboration is the bedding on which CSR will rest. Businesses can no longer find the answers to all their problems in their own resources and assets.

And for many that's a scary thought.

Any thoughts, thoughts or questions, drop me a line on editor@hrzone.co.uk.

Best wishes

Jamie