Bribery act hesitation could lead to export blacklist for UK



reward_gold_box_present_prize_surprise

UK companies face ending up on an international export blacklist as a result of coalition government moves to water down the Bribery Act, an international anti-corruption watchdog has warned.

 
Mark Pieth, chairman of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development’s (OECD) 36-member anti-bribery group, issued the warning after Ken Clarke, the justice secretary, said yesterday that implementation of the Act had been pushed back as a result of intense business lobbying. The government’s ongoing “growth review” will include an assessment of the impact of the new anti-graft rules.
 
The decision came to light on the same day that John Cridland, the new head of employers’ lobby group the CBI said that the recently passed legislation was “not fit for purpose” as it lacked clarity and could harm British business.
 
But Pieth told the Guardian that he was “disappointed and concerned” at the prospect of further delays to implementation and that patience was “running out fast” among other industrialised nations. The last Labour government passed the Act only after protracted holdups.
 
“This move will hurt the competitiveness of British industry at a moment when it is most vulnerable. Allowing companies to continue to generate business by bribery actually weakens their competitive clout as they become dependent on illegal means,” Pieth said.
 
He added that the OECD had “already threatened to blacklist British companies if they remained under-regulated”, following a highly critical UK inspection in 2008 after criminal investigations into corruption allegations against arms company BAE were terminated by the Labour government.
 
“Competitors are getting ready to take robust action against the UK in the light of continued lack of compliance with international law,” Pieth said, adding that “the new [UK] law is by no means stricter than the laws of other OECD member states”.
 
US, French and German firms in particular are thought to be particularly irritated by what they perceive to be attempts by UK companies to steal a march on other countries.
 
The new anti-corruption regulations were intended to bring the UK more closely into line with the US, which has taken a much tougher approach to rooting out corruption in foreign business deals. They were meant to be implemented in April, but no new date has been set following the latest delay, although the Ministry of Justice has said that the Act will not come into force until three months after any guidance was published.

Tags:

Login or register to tag items

Create your free account

  • Access all articles in full
  • View multimedia
  • Receive email bulletins
  • Private messaging
Register now

Login

Forgotten your password?

Editor's Note - May 10

Had a busy week with two days at the Responsible Business Summit in London. What struck me was the appetite for sustainability in the corporate world. I spoke to senior figures from multinationals who knew wholeheartedly that businesses in the future would not succeed if the society around them failed.

Much of this appetite was understandably focused on collaboration - the future of sustainability. Words that were previously indicative of success - power, might, scale, size - are no longer enough in the open source, peer-reviewed future where opponents will not simply grumble and moan and then leave you in peace. Companies must work with governments, NGOs, charities and social enterprises as a matter of course. And even competitors, where necessary.

Facilitating this collaboration is the big challenge of the next five years. Highly-strung and ego-centric companies, feverish with the need to protect their brand, will struggle the most, but it's either adapt or die.

The business/charity relationship is one of the most interesting focal points. Business power can drive positive social change in so many ways but charities are the key holders to communities. As businesses are expected more and more to play a stake in the future, charity partnerships should be top of the corporate priority list. Businesses that don't work closely with a charity will find themselves with reputational problems.

There's a lot more to CSR, of course, but collaboration is the bedding on which CSR will rest. Businesses can no longer find the answers to all their problems in their own resources and assets.

And for many that's a scary thought.

Any thoughts, thoughts or questions, drop me a line on editor@hrzone.co.uk.

Best wishes

Jamie

Related Whitepapers