Legislation update: Stress at work – ignore at your peril
Posted by Richard White in Employment law on Tue, 26/05/2009 - 12:50
- The presence of specialist support services will not stop an employer being held liable for stress at work
- No job is inherently more likely to cause stress than any other job
- Employers must consider how to deploy specialist support services
- Respond quickly to employees who indicate that they are feeling stressed
The leading case in the area of stress at work is Hatton v Sutherland in which the Court of Appeal set out guidelines on an employer's obligations in relation to workplace stress. The recent case of Connor v Surrey County Council highlighted that the presence of specialist support services was not sufficient for an employer to avoid liability for stress at work. An employer must actively consider how to deploy its support services when faced with an employee at risk of psychiatric injury.
To read the rest of the article you'll need to log in below
If you've forgotten your details click here for a reminder
If you haven't got an account, it's free and only takes a minute to set one up,
click here to register




