The benefits of a default retirement age
- Employers must be aware that, if workers remain in employment longer there will be additional costs
- There is a need for improved education so workers really understand the importance of saving for retirement
- The removal of the default retirement age could result in employers not being able to set a termination age on their insurance policy
At the outset it is important to state that workers over 65-years-old are often an invaluable resource of knowledge and experience, something sorely needed in business, particularly during these trying times. It is also worth asserting that there is no real evidence to suggest that all employers are culling their workforce at the default retirement age just because they can. The flexibility the current age regulations afford employers are a good thing, where business needs require it; and importantly where the worker wants to, there is scope for people to remain in the workplace. Where no such need exists employers can follow the retirement processes and allow workers to retire.
However, as part of a 'building society for all ages' strategy the default retirement age issue is to be reviewed in 2010, a year earlier than previously announced. In an ageing society this seems a reasonably sensible approach, but as ever it would appear that employers are going to have to bear the brunt of this. If workers remain in employment longer there will undoubtedly be additional costs in the pension and benefits arena and employers need to prepare for this.
To read the rest of the article you'll need to log in below
If you've forgotten your details click here for a reminder
If you haven't got an account, it's free and only takes a minute to set one up,
click here to register



